SUPERINTENDENTS: “No Governor, this is not keeping the promise”
By SAM TERRY
Jobe Publishing, Inc.
While complimenting Gov. Matt Bevin for tackling the issue of pension reform, Barren County Schools Superintendent Bo Matthews said
“it’s been a predicted storm that is now upon us” as he spoke at a press conference hosted by the Kentucky School Boards Association on Monday afternoon. Flanked by the superintendents of the organization’s Region Three, he said the pension reform proposal is a “decision that will impact tax payers, school districts, classroom teachers and ultimately every child that walks through the doors of our public schools.” Matthews is president of the Kentucky Association of School Superintendents.
Matthews was among a handful of speakers who issued a call to attention to the public to understand the potential impacts of Bevin’s proposed legislation that was partially revealed last week. The full proposal has not been released but rather a series of condensed highlights.
Warren County Schools Superintendent Rob Clayton borrowed the Bevin administration’s familiar United We Stand slogan to proclaim, “United We Stand here today because it’s the moral and ethically right thing to do unlike the Governor’s pension proposal. A promise is a promise. No, Governor, this is not keeping the promise.”
“I and my colleagues behind me will take a stand to protect our children and our community. In fact, they are counting on us to do so,” Clayton said. Warren East High School in Clayton’s school district hosted the press conference and the meeting of the KSBA afterwards.
Echoing Clayton’s comments, Matthews said the proposed overhaul of Kentucky’s retirement systems will “impact tax payers, school districts, local schools, classroom teachers and ultimately every child that walks through the doors of our public schools.” Matthews said Barren County Schools and others would “see a mass exodus of our most experienced staff if the proposed legislation passes.”
Specifically, Matthews said Barren County Schools has more than a fourth of current certified staff eligible for retirement in the next 7 years. “We have over 50 employees who could retire this year.” Under the plan, local school districts would see a 50-percent increase in classified contributions which would mean an increase of just under $700,000. “This means less money for our local schools, classrooms, teachers, and students. Our strongest teachers leaving the profession before their time. Deep cuts that reduce money directly spent on students,” Matthews said.
“In Barren County, our entire high school math department could retire today creating a terrible deficit in meeting the academic needs of students, which in turn means we aren’t meeting the economic needs of our state.” As for future teachers, Matthews said “local universities are reporting a 30-percent decrease in teacher education enrollment. How can we expect to draw qualified people into education if they perceive a lack of support from our state officials?”
Simpson County Schools Superintendent Jim Flynn expressed similar concerns, revealing that the proposal’s requirement for retirees who take a job, such as substitute teaching, must suspend their pension. That, in turn, means public school districts will lose most of their substitute teachers according to Flynn. Afterwards, Caverna Independent Schools Superintendent Cornelius Faulkner and Glasgow Independent Schools Superintendent Keith Hale both confirmed that such a regulation would impose significant hardships on their school districts and others around the state, most of which have only a small pool of qualified substitutes.
Flynn said that proposal regarding retirees would remove some of the most experienced educators from the substitute teacher pool. Flynn explained that public schools invest four days per year in continuing training for teachers and over a 27-year period, the cost of in-service training amounts to nearly $60,000 per teacher. He said removing such highly skilled staff from substitute teaching would be a waste of valuable resources.
Another issue brought forth by the superintendents is the proposal to free cost of living adjustments on current and future retirees. Matthews said such a freeze would “potentially decrease the current average retiree’s income by as much as $75,000 over the course of a lifetime.” Classroom teachers who plan to retire in the next 5 years will lose up to $48,000 over each 10-year period of their retirement, Matthews added.
Speaking on behalf of superintendents across the Commonwealth, Matthews said “education is an essential part of the pipeline to growing Kentucky’s economy. We all know public education is the great equalizer that gives our children the hope for social mobility and a bright future. We all know that qualified teachers are the greatest predictor of a child’s academic success. As we work to solve these problems, we need to ensure the steps we take will not dim the bright future we all want for the children of the Commonwealth.”
It starts with our children, our future. A promise is a promise. Meant to be kept! This is not just a job Mr Bevin these professionals are resposible for educating our future…resposible FOR our future if you will. What they do for us is immeasurable lets not cut off our nose despite our face! Take care of the future of our future
This pension plan, as it is written, will harm education and will not be keeping the promise made by the legislature years ago. Also, I would love for someone to explain to me what happened to the money “borrowed” from, the then solid, KTRS pension system at least twice in the last 40 years. Also, what happened to the lottery helping with education costs?
The Superintendents are correct in their assessments. This proposal will devastate education in Kentucky, but Gov. Bevin refuses to listen. Instead, he mouths off at former Superintendent Tom Shelton for suggesting school districts take a day to be made up later to come to Frankfort to let their opinions be known. Anytime educators try to point out the negatives of the proposal, Bevin gets defensive and puts those groups down. He is not interested in what his proposal will do to state workers and the long term negative effects, he just wants his way. The Superintendents also pointed out the negative financial outcome of freezing the COLAS, but what they didn’t say is that there is no guarantee that they will be given back after five years. I have never seen the state give back something they took away with the promise of putting it back in later. If they freeze the COLAs, we will never get it back.
I would like to express my sincere thanks to all of the superintendents of Kentucky for standing up for the children and employees of their respective districts. As a former educator and school superintendent, I applaud your courage to speak out against the Governor’s insane plan that, if passed, will surely destroy public education in the Commonwealth of Kentucky. Your leadership in speaking truth to power is greatly appreciated by all.
United We Stand,
Retired Superintendent (Barbourville Independent and Knox County, KY)